Rk | Gcar | Gtm | Date | Team | Opp | Type | Result | GS | MP | FG | FGA | 3P | 3PA | 2P | 2PA | FT | FTA | ORB | DRB | TRB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | PTS | GmSc | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 2010-11-14 | DePaul | Chicago State | REG (Non-Conf) | W 114-81 | 14 | 0 | 4 | .000 | 0 | 4 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 3 | 4 | .750 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5.4 | |||
2 | 2 | 2 | 2010-11-16 | DePaul | Western Carolina | REG (Non-Conf) | L 64-69 | 14 | 1 | 5 | .200 | 0 | 2 | .000 | 1 | 3 | .333 | .200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2.2 | |||
3 | 3 | 3 | 2010-11-25 | DePaul | N | Oklahoma State | REG (Non-Conf) | L 56-60 | 3 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2.4 | |||
4 | 4 | 4 | 2010-11-26 | DePaul | N | Cal State Northridge | REG (Non-Conf) | L 66-88 | 17 | 2 | 7 | .286 | 0 | 2 | .000 | 2 | 5 | .400 | .286 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -0.2 | ||
5 | 5 | 6 | 2010-12-02 | DePaul | Northern Illinois | REG (Non-Conf) | W 86-84 | 20 | 0 | 6 | .000 | 0 | 4 | .000 | 0 | 2 | .000 | .000 | 3 | 4 | .750 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | ||
6 | 6 | 7 | 2010-12-05 | DePaul | Central Michigan | REG (Non-Conf) | W 71-62 | 4 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1.7 | ||||
7 | 7 | 8 | 2010-12-08 | DePaul | @ | Indiana State | REG (Non-Conf) | L 51-73 | 11 | 0 | 2 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1.5 | ||
8 | 8 | 9 | 2010-12-11 | DePaul | Ball State | REG (Non-Conf) | L 77-79 (OT) | 3 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.7 | ||||
9 | 9 | 10 | 2010-12-14 | DePaul | Milwaukee | REG (Non-Conf) | W 61-47 | 6 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.6 | ||||
10 | 10 | 11 | 2010-12-18 | DePaul | Loyola Chicago | REG (Non-Conf) | W 81-74 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||
11 | 11 | 12 | 2010-12-22 | DePaul | Florida Atlantic | REG (Non-Conf) | W 71-62 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -0.4 | |||||||
12 | 12 | 13 | 2010-12-28 | DePaul | @ | Cincinnati | REG (Conf) | L 60-76 | 5 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -3.1 | |||
13 | 13 | 15 | 2011-01-04 | DePaul | West Virginia | REG (Conf) | L 65-67 | 14 | 2 | 5 | .400 | 2 | 5 | .400 | 0 | 0 | .600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4.6 | ||||
14 | 14 | 16 | 2011-01-12 | DePaul | Seton Hall | REG (Conf) | L 67-78 | 4 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.7 | ||||
15 | 15 | 17 | 2011-01-15 | DePaul | Connecticut | REG (Conf) | L 62-82 | 16 | 4 | 7 | .571 | 3 | 5 | .600 | 1 | 2 | .500 | .786 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 8.7 | |||
16 | 16 | 18 | 2011-01-18 | DePaul | @ | Marquette | REG (Conf) | L 64-94 | 15 | 0 | 5 | .000 | 0 | 4 | .000 | 0 | 1 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -4.2 | ||
17 | 17 | 20 | 2011-01-27 | DePaul | @ | South Florida | REG (Conf) | L 60-71 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1.250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5.8 | ||
18 | 18 | 21 | 2011-02-03 | DePaul | Notre Dame | REG (Conf) | L 58-83 | 21 | 3 | 6 | .500 | 2 | 4 | .500 | 1 | 2 | .500 | .667 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7.2 | ||
19 | 19 | 22 | 2011-02-05 | DePaul | @ | Louisville | REG (Conf) | L 57-61 | 19 | 3 | 6 | .500 | 2 | 4 | .500 | 1 | 2 | .500 | .667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5.8 | ||
20 | 20 | 23 | 2011-02-08 | DePaul | Cincinnati | REG (Conf) | L 68-71 | 28 | 5 | 8 | .625 | 2 | 4 | .500 | 3 | 4 | .750 | .750 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 9.8 | ||
21 | 21 | 24 | 2011-02-12 | DePaul | @ | West Virginia | REG (Conf) | L 71-82 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | -0.5 | ||||||
22 | 22 | 25 | 2011-02-17 | DePaul | @ | Providence | REG (Conf) | W 79-76 | 12 | 2 | 4 | .500 | 1 | 2 | .500 | 1 | 2 | .500 | .625 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4.2 | |
23 | 23 | 26 | 2011-02-19 | DePaul | Villanova | REG (Conf) | L 75-77 (OT) | 26 | 5 | 10 | .500 | 3 | 7 | .429 | 2 | 3 | .667 | .650 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 12.7 | ||
24 | 24 | 27 | 2011-02-23 | DePaul | @ | St. John's (NY) | REG (Conf) | L 51-76 | * | 16 | 0 | 2 | .000 | 0 | 2 | .000 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 1 | 2 | .500 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1.2 | |
25 | 25 | 28 | 2011-02-26 | DePaul | South Florida | REG (Conf) | L 76-86 | 23 | 4 | 10 | .400 | 1 | 6 | .167 | 3 | 4 | .750 | .450 | 7 | 8 | .875 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10.7 | ||
26 | 26 | 29 | 2011-03-02 | DePaul | Rutgers | REG (Conf) | L 64-68 | 22 | 2 | 8 | .250 | 1 | 5 | .200 | 1 | 3 | .333 | .313 | 5 | 5 | 1.000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 3.6 | ||
27 | 27 | 30 | 2011-03-05 | DePaul | @ | Syracuse | REG (Conf) | L 59-107 | 19 | 7 | 13 | .538 | 2 | 5 | .400 | 5 | 8 | .625 | .615 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 11.1 | ||
Rk | Gcar | Gtm | Date | Team | Opp | Type | Result | GS | MP | FG | FGA | 3P | 3PA | 2P | 2PA | FT | FTA | ORB | DRB | TRB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | PTS | GmSc | ||||||
28 | 28 | 31 | 2011-03-08 | DePaul | N | Connecticut | CTOURN | L 71-97 | 25 | 5 | 11 | .455 | 1 | 3 | .333 | 4 | 8 | .500 | .500 | 3 | 5 | .600 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 5.6 | |
7-21 | 1 | 392 | 47 | 127 | .370 | 21 | 75 | .280 | 26 | 52 | .500 | .453 | 29 | 35 | .829 | 13 | 37 | 50 | 21 | 10 | 8 | 31 | 35 | 144 | 2.8 |
We're Social...for Statheads
Every Sports Reference Social Media Account
Site Last Updated: Tuesday, March 4, 6:05AM
Question, Comment, Feedback, or Correction?
Subscribe to our Free Email Newsletter
Do you have a sports website? Or write about sports? We have tools and resources that can help you use sports data. Find out more.