Receiving | Rushing | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rk | Gcar | Gtm | Date | School | Opponent | Type | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Att | Yds | TD | Bowl | |||
1 | 18 | 1 | 2010-09-04 | Notre Dame | Purdue | REG (Non-Conf) | W 23-12 | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
2 | 19 | 2 | 2010-09-11 | Notre Dame | Michigan | REG (Non-Conf) | L 24-28 | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
3 | 20 | 3 | 2010-09-18 | Notre Dame | @ | Michigan State | REG (Non-Conf) | L 31-34 (OT) | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
4 | 21 | 4 | 2010-09-25 | Notre Dame | Stanford | REG (Non-Conf) | L 14-37 | 8 | 110 | 13.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
5 | 22 | 5 | 2010-10-02 | Notre Dame | @ | Boston College | REG (Non-Conf) | W 31-13 | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
6 | 23 | 6 | 2010-10-09 | Notre Dame | Pitt | REG (Non-Conf) | W 23-17 | 7 | 59 | 8.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
7 | 24 | 7 | 2010-10-16 | Notre Dame | Western Michigan | REG (Non-Conf) | W 44-20 | 9 | 157 | 17.4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
8 | 25 | 9 | 2010-10-30 | Notre Dame | Tulsa | REG (Non-Conf) | L 27-28 | 11 | 104 | 9.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
9 | 26 | 10 | 2010-11-13 | Notre Dame | Utah | REG (Non-Conf) | W 28-3 | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
10 | 27 | 11 | 2010-11-20 | Notre Dame | @ | Army | REG (Non-Conf) | W 27-3 | 3 | 63 | 21.0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | |
11 | 28 | 12 | 2010-11-27 | Notre Dame | @ | USC | REG (Non-Conf) | W 20-16 | 11 | 86 | 7.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
12 | 29 | 13 | 2010-12-31 | Notre Dame | N | Miami (FL) | Bowl | W 33-17 | 6 | 109 | 18.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Sun Bowl | |
8-4 | 79 | 1025 | 13.0 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
We're Social...for Statheads
Every Sports Reference Social Media Account
Site Last Updated: Friday, June 13, 7:36AM
Question, Comment, Feedback, or Correction?
Subscribe to our Free Email Newsletter
Do you have a sports website? Or write about sports? We have tools and resources that can help you use sports data. Find out more.