2009-10 Advanced Game Log
2009-10 Advanced Game Log Table
G |
Date |
|
Opp |
W/L |
Tm |
Opp |
ORtg |
DRtg |
Pace |
FTr |
3PAr |
TS% |
TRB% |
AST% |
STL% |
BLK% |
|
eFG% |
TOV% |
ORB% |
FT/FGA |
|
eFG% |
TOV% |
DRB% |
FT/FGA |
1 | 2009-11-13 | | Furman | W | 68 | 48 | 79.9 | 56.4 | 85.1 | .153 | .153 | .373 | 56.5 | 69.0 | 22.3 | 25.0 | | .347 | 16.5 | 42.9 | .106 | | .318 | 29.7 | 75.0 | .236 |
2 | 2009-11-16 | @ | College of Charleston | L | 55 | 68 | 66.2 | 81.8 | 83.1 | .365 | .238 | .372 | 48.7 | 40.0 | 10.8 | 9.1 | | .349 | 22.9 | 26.2 | .175 | | .439 | 22.1 | 75.0 | .316 |
3 | 2009-11-19 | | South Carolina | W (2 OT) | 94 | 92 | 102.9 | 100.7 | 71.7 | .530 | .212 | .569 | 54.4 | 55.9 | 10.9 | 11.3 | | .561 | 22.5 | 44.1 | .303 | | .500 | 16.6 | 62.2 | .243 |
4 | 2009-11-24 | @ | Kennesaw State | W | 75 | 69 | 81.2 | 74.7 | 92.4 | .596 | .263 | .513 | 55.6 | 77.8 | 11.9 | 7.3 | | .509 | 29.1 | 31.3 | .298 | | .398 | 27.7 | 80.6 | .481 |
5 | 2009-11-27 | | Richmond | L | 67 | 86 | 88.8 | 114.0 | 75.4 | .179 | .268 | .551 | 46.8 | 57.1 | 11.9 | 2.5 | | .554 | 25.7 | 28.6 | .089 | | .673 | 23.1 | 73.7 | .218 |
6 | 2009-11-28 | @ | Hofstra | W | 69 | 68 | 88.0 | 86.7 | 78.4 | .243 | .243 | .418 | 48.6 | 52.0 | 14.0 | 7.3 | | .385 | 13.6 | 35.7 | .162 | | .520 | 25.5 | 66.7 | .320 |
7 | 2009-11-29 | @ | UConn | L | 48 | 87 | 61.7 | 111.8 | 77.8 | .231 | .365 | .416 | 33.8 | 63.2 | 9.0 | 0.0 | | .433 | 31.1 | 14.3 | .058 | | .556 | 18.9 | 56.7 | .270 |
8 | 2009-12-03 | @ | Northwestern | W | 69 | 68 | 99.1 | 97.6 | 69.7 | .143 | .349 | .513 | 43.9 | 77.8 | 14.4 | 2.9 | | .492 | 17.2 | 26.7 | .111 | | .552 | 25.0 | 63.0 | .313 |
9 | 2009-12-06 | | Charleston Southern | W | 104 | 52 | 131.5 | 65.7 | 79.1 | .380 | .296 | .620 | 67.7 | 73.0 | 17.7 | 16.7 | | .585 | 11.6 | 47.2 | .296 | | .430 | 32.8 | 93.1 | .349 |
10 | 2009-12-12 | @ | Chattanooga | L | 56 | 69 | 78.8 | 97.1 | 71.0 | .347 | .306 | .491 | 42.3 | 52.4 | 8.4 | 20.5 | | .469 | 24.0 | 16.7 | .204 | | .392 | 14.8 | 61.0 | .277 |
11 | 2009-12-15 | | USC Upstate | W | 78 | 65 | 89.4 | 74.5 | 88.1 | .352 | .155 | .471 | 51.1 | 51.6 | 17.2 | 15.4 | | .458 | 22.5 | 47.6 | .183 | | .342 | 23.5 | 54.0 | .171 |
12 | 2009-12-19 | @ | Ohio | W (1 OT) | 89 | 81 | 100.2 | 91.2 | 79.0 | .365 | .324 | .513 | 54.2 | 79.3 | 7.9 | 21.1 | | .453 | 18.7 | 43.6 | .297 | | .459 | 17.3 | 63.6 | .176 |
13 | 2009-12-21 | | Wofford | W | 67 | 51 | 85.3 | 64.9 | 78.5 | .206 | .221 | .449 | 61.3 | 66.7 | 12.7 | 16.7 | | .426 | 18.5 | 41.7 | .132 | | .287 | 19.9 | 77.3 | .262 |
14 | 2009-12-28 | | Georgia | L | 47 | 59 | 67.8 | 85.1 | 69.3 | .186 | .390 | .366 | 41.0 | 64.7 | 7.2 | 14.9 | | .331 | 20.9 | 31.6 | .136 | | .355 | 17.9 | 50.0 | .242 |
15 | 2009-12-30 | | Georgetown | L | 57 | 72 | 81.4 | 102.8 | 70.1 | .311 | .311 | .407 | 58.2 | 55.0 | 11.4 | 9.1 | | .369 | 20.4 | 42.5 | .197 | | .518 | 14.8 | 81.5 | .273 |
16 | 2010-01-04 | @ | Charlotte | L | 57 | 64 | 80.2 | 90.1 | 71.1 | .224 | .263 | .339 | 52.7 | 60.0 | 9.9 | 6.1 | | .276 | 16.0 | 48.1 | .197 | | .412 | 16.9 | 59.5 | .431 |
17 | 2010-01-07 | | Duke | L | 41 | 67 | 55.2 | 90.1 | 74.3 | .346 | .192 | .339 | 38.4 | 61.5 | 12.1 | 14.0 | | .279 | 27.5 | 26.2 | .231 | | .427 | 23.3 | 54.8 | .226 |
18 | 2010-01-11 | @ | Georgia Tech | L | 58 | 72 | 72.6 | 90.1 | 79.9 | .219 | .219 | .410 | 40.5 | 58.3 | 12.5 | 10.4 | | .391 | 21.2 | 23.7 | .125 | | .412 | 21.3 | 58.3 | .439 |
19 | 2010-01-14 | | Florida State | L | 50 | 80 | 65.6 | 105.0 | 76.2 | .310 | .103 | .376 | 44.6 | 75.0 | 14.4 | 2.6 | | .345 | 24.8 | 31.7 | .172 | | .557 | 22.4 | 66.7 | .396 |
20 | 2010-01-22 | @ | UNC | L | 61 | 79 | 75.9 | 98.3 | 80.3 | .197 | .273 | .423 | 47.6 | 73.1 | 12.4 | 2.1 | | .432 | 24.2 | 34.2 | .061 | | .561 | 23.1 | 68.0 | .263 |
G |
Date |
|
Opp |
W/L |
Tm |
Opp |
ORtg |
DRtg |
Pace |
FTr |
3PAr |
TS% |
TRB% |
AST% |
STL% |
BLK% |
|
eFG% |
TOV% |
ORB% |
FT/FGA |
|
eFG% |
TOV% |
DRB% |
FT/FGA |
21 | 2010-01-24 | @ | Wake Forest | L | 43 | 63 | 62.3 | 91.2 | 69.1 | .375 | .250 | .380 | 47.0 | 33.3 | 10.1 | 9.1 | | .323 | 27.1 | 25.0 | .250 | | .430 | 18.8 | 67.6 | .246 |
22 | 2010-01-29 | | Boston College | W | 68 | 65 | 93.8 | 89.7 | 72.5 | .431 | .172 | .487 | 50.7 | 69.6 | 12.4 | 11.8 | | .414 | 14.7 | 29.4 | .345 | | .435 | 17.8 | 70.3 | .177 |
23 | 2010-01-31 | | NC State | W | 69 | 56 | 88.6 | 71.9 | 77.9 | .404 | .193 | .508 | 51.2 | 72.0 | 10.3 | 14.3 | | .474 | 22.7 | 31.4 | .263 | | .266 | 19.8 | 65.3 | .344 |
24 | 2010-02-04 | @ | Virginia | L | 60 | 82 | 76.6 | 104.7 | 78.3 | .200 | .364 | .498 | 40.0 | 45.5 | 15.3 | 4.5 | | .473 | 26.8 | 13.8 | .145 | | .573 | 21.6 | 76.2 | .345 |
25 | 2010-02-08 | | Georgia Tech | L | 53 | 68 | 64.8 | 83.2 | 81.8 | .190 | .222 | .386 | 46.7 | 65.0 | 15.9 | 17.0 | | .341 | 26.7 | 31.4 | .159 | | .529 | 28.1 | 68.0 | .275 |
26 | 2010-02-11 | @ | Florida State | L | 50 | 67 | 66.7 | 89.4 | 74.9 | .200 | .215 | .351 | 50.0 | 42.1 | 10.7 | 10.9 | | .300 | 21.1 | 38.1 | .169 | | .476 | 22.8 | 64.7 | .129 |
27 | 2010-02-14 | @ | Maryland | L | 51 | 71 | 67.1 | 93.5 | 76.0 | .242 | .177 | .369 | 41.1 | 55.6 | 18.4 | 9.8 | | .306 | 22.4 | 33.3 | .210 | | .420 | 24.0 | 51.6 | .429 |
28 | 2010-02-18 | | Miami (FL) | W (1 OT) | 73 | 72 | 90.3 | 89.1 | 68.8 | .203 | .275 | .482 | 56.8 | 66.7 | 11.1 | 12.5 | | .478 | 23.3 | 41.5 | .101 | | .500 | 19.3 | 75.8 | .161 |
29 | 2010-02-25 | @ | Virginia Tech | L | 69 | 70 | 94.1 | 95.4 | 73.4 | .230 | .262 | .510 | 45.8 | 46.2 | 16.4 | 10.6 | | .484 | 15.1 | 30.0 | .164 | | .569 | 27.1 | 72.2 | .235 |
30 | 2010-02-28 | | Wake Forest | W | 67 | 62 | 99.0 | 91.6 | 67.7 | .580 | .220 | .525 | 49.2 | 63.6 | 16.3 | 8.6 | | .490 | 18.0 | 33.3 | .360 | | .462 | 23.2 | 65.5 | .269 |
31 | 2010-03-04 | @ | NC State | L | 54 | 59 | 68.7 | 75.1 | 78.6 | .217 | .217 | .408 | 38.0 | 19.0 | 19.1 | 10.0 | | .367 | 22.3 | 13.9 | .167 | | .381 | 24.4 | 62.9 | .237 |
We're Social...for Statheads
Every Sports Reference Social Media Account
Site Last Updated: Saturday, November 23, 5:41AM
Question, Comment, Feedback, or Correction?
Subscribe to our Free Email Newsletter
Do you have a sports website? Or write about sports? We have tools and resources that can help you use sports data. Find out more.